Posh Training For Employees in Delhi

In a notable judgment upholding the principles of procedural fairness under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( POSH Act ), the Bombay High Court in Saurabh Kumar Mallick v. The Comptroller & Auditor General of India & Others highlighted the critical need for Internal Committees (ICs) to conduct impartial, transparent, and legally sound inquiries. The Court emphasized that while the POSH Act aims to protect women from harassment, it equally mandates adherence to natural justice for both complainants and respondents. The case involved Saurabh Kumar Mallick, a senior official, who challenged the findings of an Internal Committee that had found him guilty of sexual harassment. Mallick argued that the inquiry was conducted in violation of the principles of natural justice, including denial of opportunity to present his defense, absence of cross-examination, and lack of proper documentation of evidence. The Bombay High Cou...

In an important ruling aimed at safeguarding procedural fairness under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act), the Kerala High Court, in the case of Abraham Mathai v. State of Kerala & Ors., has categorically held that a written complaint from the aggrieved woman is a mandatory prerequisite for initiating any inquiry by the Internal Committee (IC). The judgment sets clear boundaries on the initiation of proceedings, preventing misuse and ensuring due process. The case arose when an individual challenged the initiation of a POSH inquiry that was based on an oral complaint and anonymous allegations rather than a formal written complaint as stipulated under Section 9 of the Act. The petitioner contended that the Internal Committee had overstepped its jurisdiction by entertaining allegations that were not formally registered in writing, thereby violating the basic procedural safeguards built into the statute. The Keral...

In a significant judgment reinforcing the principles of fairness and restorative justice under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( POSH Act ), the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Dr. Kali Charan Sabat vs. Union of India & Others (W.P. No. 10021/2024) has held that conciliation under Section 10 of the Act is mandatory before an Internal Committee (IC) proceeds with a formal inquiry, provided the complainant is open to conciliation. The case arose when Dr. Kali Charan Sabat challenged the initiation of an inquiry by the Internal Committee without being given the opportunity for conciliation as envisaged under the POSH Act. The petitioner argued that Section 10 of the Act provides for a mechanism where, upon receipt of a complaint, the IC must offer conciliation to the aggrieved woman before resorting to a full-fledged inquiry. The failure to follow this mandatory step, according to the petitioner, was a violation o...

The digital era has transformed how organizations approach compliance with the Prevention of Sexual Harassment ( POSH ) Act, 2013. Technology-driven solutions are making it easier for companies to educate employees, track compliance, and streamline reporting mechanisms, ultimately creating safer and more transparent workplaces. How Technology is Revolutionizing POSH Compliance Organizations are increasingly leveraging digital tools to enhance their POSH Act implementation. Some key advancements include: 1. E-Learning and Virtual Training – Online modules and AI-driven simulations make POSH training more engaging and accessible to employees across different locations. 2. AI-Powered Complaint Management Systems – Automated reporting systems ensure confidentiality, provide step-by-step guidance, and help track case progress efficiently. 3. Secure Digital Reporting Platforms – Web-based portals and mobile apps enable employees to report harassment incidents anonymously and securely. ...

In the case cited, the courts have provided important clarifications regarding the powers and limitations of internal committees tasked with investigating complaints of harassment or misconduct.  Let's elaborate on each point: Initiation of Investigation: In the case of Shital Prasad Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (2018 SCC Online Raj 1676), the court clarified that an internal committee can initiate an investigation based on a complaint received from any source of authority, provided that the complainant agrees to pursue the matter with the committee. This means that the committee's jurisdiction isn't limited solely to complaints directly submitted to them but extends to complaints forwarded or received from other sources, as long as the complainant consents to the committee's involvement. Implication: The internal committee's role is to address complaints of harassment or misconduct regardless of the source of the complaint. It emphasizes the importance of...

Union of India Citation v Banani Chattopadhyay - (2022) 1 HCC (Cal) 351 Court – High Court of Calcutta. Facts of the Case – The petitioner, Banani Chattopadhyay, was a Deputy Manager at Hindustan Cables Ltd. (HCL). She opted for voluntary retirement on 31.01.2017 following a decision to close down the company. After retirement, she was engaged on a temporary basis as a consultant and later as an advisor. She was released from her temporary engagement on 30.04.2018. on 09.05.2018, she lodged a complaint of sexual harassment against Respondent 9 (allegedly the head of HCL), claiming the incidents began in the last quarter of 2016. An Internal Complaints Committee was constituted to investigate her complaint. The ICC submitted its report on 19.06.2018, concluding that the allegations were not proved. The petitioner filed a write petition challenging the ICC’s report and constitution. Legal Issues:- 1. Whether the Internal Complaints Committee had jurisdiction to inquire into the complain...